<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Good vs. Evil: Keeping John Lackey</title>
	<atom:link href="http://monkeywithahalo.com/2009/11/04/good-vs-evil-keeping-john-lackey/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://monkeywithahalo.com/2009/11/04/good-vs-evil-keeping-john-lackey/</link>
	<description>The happenings of the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 19:57:39 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://monkeywithahalo.com/2009/11/04/good-vs-evil-keeping-john-lackey/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 06:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://monkeywithahalo.com/?p=3651#comment-84</guid>
		<description>Great post, really covers all of the pros/cons of going after Lackey.  I can&#039;t articulate why with any sort of precision, but my gut feeling is that the 4 year / $60 million extension the Angels offered him last winter sounds about right.  Anything substantially more would most likely be overpaying.  Keep up the good work, looking forward to reading more!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, really covers all of the pros/cons of going after Lackey.  I can&#8217;t articulate why with any sort of precision, but my gut feeling is that the 4 year / $60 million extension the Angels offered him last winter sounds about right.  Anything substantially more would most likely be overpaying.  Keep up the good work, looking forward to reading more!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
